THE NATION THINKS…

Written by Anita Marks on February 14th, 2008 @ 8:34 am

See below for the results from across SportsNation.

Your responses in bold text.

1) How much of Wednesday’s congressional hearing did you watch and/or listen to?
40.5% Most of it
36.0% Just highlights
16.0% All of it
7.5% I haven’t seen nor heard any of it
2) After this hearing, whom do you believe more?
78.7% Brian McNamee
21.3% Roger Clemens
3) Which person gave a better ‘performance’ in front of the committee?
33.6% Brian McNamee
33.0% Both were equally unimpressive
28.9% Roger Clemens
4.4% Both were equally impressive
4) Which statement do you feel best describes the overall stance of the committee?
43.2% Neutral
28.9% Pro-McNamee
27.9% Pro-Clemens
5) Has this hearing changed your opinion about Clemens’ guilt or innocence?
59.8% No, I still think he’s guilty
18.6% Yes, I now think he’s guilty
8.7% No, I still think he’s innocent
8.1% I don’t have an opinion on his guilt or innocence
5.0% Yes, I now think he’s innocent
6) Did Clemens’ lawyers make a mistake in insisting that the committee hold a hearing instead of issuing a report?
68.3% Yes
31.7% No
7) Did Roger Clemens do something improper by inviting his former nanny to his home over the weekend before the Committee interviewed her?
66.5% Yes
24.3% Not enough information to judge
9.2% No
8) How important is the alleged party thrown by Jose Canseco at which Brian McNamee claims Roger Clemens talked to Canseco about steroids?
37.3% Not at all; Talking about steroids isn’t doing steroids
32.8% Somewhat; Even if he attended, it doesn’t mean he talked to Canseco about steroids
29.9% Very; if it is confirmed Clemens attended, it would hurt his credibility considerably
9) What was the biggest revelation from Wednesday’s hearing?
73.0% Andy Pettitte’s deposition being revealed in which he states Clemens told him he used HGH
14.4% Rep. Waxman saying he wanted to cancel the hearing but Clemens’ attorneys talked him out of it
9.3% McNamee claiming Roger Clemens at times bled from his buttocks and began to carry band-aids
3.3% McNamee claiming he injected Mike Stanton with HGH
10) In his testimony, McNamee stated that his comment ‘it is what it is’ during the infamous taped phone conversation with Clemens was his way of saying he was telling the truth. Do you agree?
68.7% Yes
31.3% No
11) Was this hearing a worthwhile use of the committee’s time?
68.7% No
31.3% Yes
12) Which statement directed towards Clemens was more awkward?
35.3% Rep. Clay: ‘A colleague of mine, Mr. Capuano of Massachusetts, wants to know what uniform you’re going to wear to the Hall of Fame.’
33.6% Rep. Norton: ‘Mr. Clemens, all I can say is, I’m sure you’re going to heaven.’
31.1% Rep. Davis: ‘Mr. Clemens, do you recall bleeding through your pants in 2001?’
13) Should Roger Clemens be indicted on charges of perjury?
68.0% Yes
32.0% No
14) Will Roger Clemens be indicted on charges of perjury?
57.8% No
42.2% Yes
Total Votes: 69,697
Posted on Thursday, February 14th, 2008 at 8:34 am.
Categories: Uncategorized.
Track comments to this post: RSS 2.0.

POST A COMMENT  |  TRACKBACK


Leave a Reply


Wedding Planning
Find Baltimore Wedding, Wedding Accessories, Bridal Shows, Wedding Program, and other wedding resources in the Baltimore area from PartyPOP.com